Skip to main content

"Open Data" opened by Elsevier

In the Xmas-holiday I received a message by Elsevier about the possibility to store raw research data online at ScienceDirect. Since the issue of Open Data is getting more and more important within the current research climate, this is an interesting initiative. For the moment, this is just a pilot program including 20 of its journals, but it might become a general possibility for all of its journals in the future.

I have not looked into the details of the program, so am not sure exactly what are strong and weak points. Questions that come to mind are:
  • who is responsible for the curation of the data?
  • is it possible to change the CC-BY license to a CC-BY-NC-ND license?
  • should reviewers take the additional burden of sifting through the raw research data? And this without being rewarded for their work? Because according to Elsevier, it will be the duty of reviewers and editors to do so: "Editors and reviewers validate that the submitted material is indeed considered to be raw research data in this field".
  • which kind of raw data should be made available?
  • will the raw data get its own Digital Object Identifier (DOI) to make it easier to credit the author(s) of the data?
  • who will be the owner of the raw data? The author(s) or Elsevier?
  • who will be the author(s) of the raw data? All authors for the corresponding paper or only those that were involved in its generation? (in an international collaborative research project this may become an interesting aspect)
  • when can the raw data be added to the paper? Only at submission time? 
  • What if parts of the data (which are not at all discussed or relevant for the current paper) will be used again for other future (or concurrent) papers?
  • Related to this last point: is there the possibility of an embargo during which the data have been deposited but not yet made public until other concurrent paper(s) have been published?
These are important issues that should be taken into consideration when deciding (or not) to publish raw data (in general), and within this particular pilot program as well. Nevertheless, an interesting initiative that should be studied in more detail, and could be leading to other editorial houses to follow suit.

This initiative is highly relevant for and very much related to a YAE Statement on Open Science that was released on Jan. 6, 2015, and which was prepared by the Open Science Task Force YAE (to which I belonged).

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Impact of Plan S on Chemistry research in Europe

Below is given a list of journals that are present at the DOAJ (Directory of Open Access Journals) and that are listed in one of the seven categories in Chemistry in the Journal Citation Reports (JCR): ·CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL ·CHEMISTRY, APPLIED ·CHEMISTRY, INORGANIC & NUCLEAR ·CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL ·CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY ·CHEMISTRY, ORGANIC ·CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL These seven categories include all 553 journals in Chemistry (see Appendix 1), except some general scientific journals like Nature, Science, Nature Communications, Scientific Reports, etc. and also does not include new initiatives like iScienceChem Squared
The full list of 49 DOAJ entries in Chemistry (8.9% of all Chemistry journals) is given in Appendix 2, but shown here below is the list of 11 journals (2.0% of all Chemistry journals in JCR!!!!) that I recognize[1]:
·ACS Central Science·Catalysts·Chemical Science·ChemistryOpen·Croatica Chemica Acta·Frontiers in Chemistry·International Journal of Molecular Sciences·Journ…

Impact of Plan-S on European Research in 10 scientific disciplines

A few weeks ago I posted already the troubling current situation for Chemistry, where out of 553 journals listed in Journal Citation Reportsonly 48 journals[1] are included in the Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ), and only 11 were known to me (i.e. 2.0%).

Today I add the same analysis for nine more fields in scientific research (Bio, CompSci, Engin, Math, MatSci, Med, Phys, Psych, Social)[2][3], with similar results. Out of the total of 4773 journals listed in JCR for these disciplines, only 399 are listed in DOAJ (8.4%).

Within the field of Chemistry, the majority of the 48 JCR/DOAJ journals were not known to me, and often included local/national journals. Assuming that the same holds for the other disciplines, and using a conservative estimate for this proportion of unknown journals (at least half), one comes to the conclusion that for the ten fields of science listed below, only ca. 2-4% of scientific journals is currently compliant with Plan S.

FieldNr. in JCRNr. in DOAJBio…

Exotic chemistry trumps nature

A few weeks ago the Twitter world was surprised by several Tweets where Chemistry played a big role. First of all, @StuartCantrill posted a cry for help:
Can somebody please hurry up and make a cyclic trimer from livermorium – I'm desperate to use 'Bizarre Lv triangle' as a cover line at NChem — Stuart Cantrill (@stuartcantrill) May 26, 2017 A few days later there was a late-night typo by @RealDonaldTrump:
Despite the constant negative press covfefe — Donald J. Trump (@realdonaldtrump) May 30, 2017 which was deleted the next day (but that does not work), and replaced by a challenge:
Who can figure out the true meaning of "covfefe" ??? Enjoy! — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) May 31, 2017
This obviously calls for a #CompChem solution, and hence I accepted the challenge and proposed a structure for the cyclic trimer livermorium (at BP86/TZ2P with Spin-Orbit ZORA as done within the ADF program):
something like this?
(cyclic Lv3 trimer with odd orbitals) pic.twit…